Archive for the 'Journalism' Category

What I’ve been up to this morning…

I woke up this morning to what sounded like a moving van being really loud trying to pull something. Then I hear, “Can someone call 911? We need an ambulance over here!” So I go outside to check it out.

A wreck, obviously. But I couldn’t quite figure out what had happened, until a man at the corner asked if my car was mine.

“Yes…”

A man had veered off the road onto the sidewalk, sideswiping my car in the process. He proceeded to continue down the sidewalk, tearing up all the neighbors’ fences, until he somehow swerved and came to a rest on the porch, two doors down from mine.

Turns out, the driver had some kind of medical problem and didn’t even realize he had crashed. His foot was still on the gas after he hit the house! A neighbor ran over, turned off his car and sat with him until the ambulance showed up, along with the rest of the cop cars and even a few firetrucks.

My mirror was halfway knocked off, and the left part of the bumper smashed in. But, still drivable. And, thankfully, nobody was hurt. Aside from the ailing man, my car and the neighbors’ fences, anyway. Just waiting for the final report to be filed now, so I can get my poor little car fixed up! So much for going to the gym this morning…

I posted the photos on Facebook as I was taking them, and leave it to one of my friends to see the silver lining in the matter:

Wikipedia: apparently a viable source for reporting

I have repeatedly said that I don’t trust the internet and online journalism. This article is a testament to what I’ve been saying, proving that information that is rapidly released without proper fact checking can go crazy awry.

In a nutshell, French composer Maurice Jarre died. What’s up next? Writing an obit, and stat. When you google-search the composer’s name, the first thing you see is his Wikipedia entry.

As a test on multimedia and journalism, an Irish student added a phony obit-friendly quote to the page, which Wikipedia actually caught and removed several times. However, given that apparently Wikipedia meets ethical standards in reporting nowadays, writers copy and pasted that quote so fast without even bothing to check for a second source.

Finding something from at least two sources, if not more, IS NECESSARY. Anyone (obviously, as demonstrated here) can edit Wikipedia articles. This phony quote made it into many professional publications and blogs when it most certainly should not have.

And the kicker? Nobody even knew, until a month later when the student who added the quote confessed to his social experiment.

“I am 100 percent convinced that if I hadn’t come forward, that quote would have gone down in history as something Maurice Jarre said, instead of something I made up,” he said. “It would have become another example where, once anything is printed enough times in the media without challenge, it becomes fact.”

I understand that some people might have done their research, quote on quote anyway, and found this quote on other Web sites. However, it still doesn’t dispute the fact that somebody lifted it without a second thought of verifying it. Which makes you wonder, how much other information is out there considered fact but is actually nothing but crap?


I’m tweeting!

Error: Please make sure the Twitter account is public.

Categories


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.